Guest belushiknuxx Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Due to the large downward spiral that TNA is on in the us, But thriving due to been on free tv in the Uk would you call TNA the UK's wrestling company over WWE? In my opinion i feel TNA take the UK into consideration over WWE (I relise that paige shamus and barrett are champs atm but how long will that last really?) it IS a good time for UK fans in WWE atm (Maybe to promote upcoming tour) However i feel that TNA is more intouch with the UK market place, however saying this i havent watched TNA since the mid Aces and Eights angle when i it started to flatline and Dixie became on screen Heel (she makes me cringe more than vickie guerrero IMO) let me know what you think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etz 78 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Not really, no. They may consider the UK more, but in most UK peoples minds WWE = wrestling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC 536 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 WWE have been touring the UK for a much longer period of time, put forth two tours every year and when they are over film episodes of RAW and Smackdown. I don't see how you could even begin to think that TNA give the UK fans more than WWE does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsrchris 190 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 There was a point where TNA could have done big business in the UK. But that point where you stopped watching, it's kinda been downhill ever since there. There's the odd glimmer in TNA, but for the most part it's just plain horrendous recently. It's not the UK's promotion. In fact, Challenge TV probably need to start looking into a better way of promoting UK Wrestling over TNA, and showing us more of that, if anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Magic Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 Yeah stick ICW in the TNA slot. That would rule. Would probably be off air in a month though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViciousPrism 177 Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 TNA do in fact consider us a bit more when it comes to meet & greet situations, but it doesn't really mean much considering in the broad sense, TNA is the drizzling shits. They sent Gunner to do a solo meet & greet at Wembley a couple of weeks ago. Borash and Simon Rothstein seem to organize a ton of UK Fan Parties too. We get a ton more TNA programming than US does, since Xplosion is international, British Boot Camp was for us, etc. But WWE still blows them away, faaaaaaaaaar and away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest belushiknuxx Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 i love seeing what people think thanks guys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jayfunk Posted May 11, 2014 Share Posted May 11, 2014 I may be wrong but doesn't tna beat wwe in tv ratings in the UK? Or at least they were Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I may be wrong but doesn't tna beat wwe in tv ratings in the UK? Or at least they were It's a tricky one, because Impact is, or at least was, available in more homes than RAW, because Sky Sports is a premium package. I know there was a time when Impact was beating RAW, but the numbers are pretty small on both sides. Something like 130,000ish for RAW, and 160,000ish for Impact, something like that. I'm not sure how it is now though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega 354 Posted May 12, 2014 Share Posted May 12, 2014 I may be wrong but doesn't tna beat wwe in tv ratings in the UK? Or at least they were Straws grasped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ThaMitchaz Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sanJmaru Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Considering it's still based out of the US, I'd say no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega 354 Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 Jeremy Borash has been doing promotional work for TNA in the UK and was asked on the v2 Wrestling podcast what he would change if he ran TNA. Borash replied: “Move it to London. The fan base is a huge missed opportunity. The production in the U.K. is miles ahead of anything that is in the U.S., and I have no idea why, but I am a huge fan of the production values over here. I would use that production, and take advantage of how passionate the crowd is.” So JB thinks TNA could be a UK promotion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jayfunk Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 isn't it moving to New York? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John Hancock Posted June 6, 2014 Share Posted June 6, 2014 isn't it moving to New York? I think that's only a temporary tour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.