Jump to content

The Bosman Ruling - Ten Years On


Clarkey
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 years since Bosman

BBC Sport

 

Ten years ago this Friday, the European Court of Justice passed a ruling that presaged a revolution in European football.

 

The desire of Jean-Marc Bosman to move from Club de Liege to Dunkerque inadvertently triggered a change in the law that altered the face of football forever.

 

Little did the low-profile midfielder from Belgium realise what his court action was about to do ...

 

 

POWER TO THE PLAYERS

 

Before Bosman, a player could not leave unless his club agreed to let him go.

 

After the ruling, a player was free to leave as soon as his contract expired.

 

Result? The player became the boss.

 

Free-agent players moving clubs could demand huge signing-on fees and salaries, on the basis that the club they were joining had not had to pay a penny in transfer fees.

 

Clubs became powerless to stop their best players leaving at the end of their existing deals.

 

And players under contract could ask for bigger and better deals for staying put - because they could threaten to leave for free if the club failed to accede to their demands.

 

 

FOREIGN FRENZY

 

Pre-Bosman, clubs were limited in the number of foreign players they could sign.

 

In European competitions, Uefa regulations decreed that clubs could field only three foreign players plus two "assimilated" players who had come through their youth set-up.

 

Post-Bosman, clubs could sign any number of players from European Union countries.

 

That made possible the phenomenon of clubs fielding teams without a single player from that country.

 

Without the Bosman ruling, Chelsea and Arsenal could never have fielded teams without a single British player, as both have famously done.

 

 

AGENTS ATTACK

 

When players became more powerful, so did their agents.

 

Agents were able to pick up fees from a club for bringing an out-of-contract star player to them, and take their cut of the signing-on fees and loyalty bonuses that they demanded for their clients.

 

The savvy amongst them were able to set themselves up as international operators, acting as negotiators for the overseas footballers pouring into the European leagues and as unofficial scouts - or touts - for the clubs signing them.

 

 

BRITISH SUCCESS IN EUROPE

 

Did Bosman help Manchester United win the Champions League?

 

British clubs pre-Bosman found themselves at a huge disadvantage in European competitions, because Uefa decreed that Welsh and Scottish players counted as foreigners under their "three-plus-two" rule.

 

That meant that United, for example, had to make wholesale changes to their normal line-up when playing in Europe - most memorably when Alex Ferguson brought English goalkeeper Gary Walsh in for the Danish Peter Schmeichel in the 4-0 thrashing by Barcelona in 1994-5.

 

When clubs were suddenly freed to play all the EU players they wanted, Sir Alex Ferguson was at last able to play his first-choice XI in Europe.

 

Only five of the 13 players who featured in United's 1999 Champions League final win over Bayern Munich were English.

 

Before the Bosman ruling, that team could never have set foot on the pitch.

 

 

THE FAN PAYS MORE

 

Clubs were forced to pay higher wages to players post-Bosman - and that meant that they sought to boost their revenues accordingly.

 

The average fan ended up footing some of the bill, partly through increased ticket prices but also for the television packages that allowed them to watch the new millionaires from the comfort of their own homes.

 

 

CLUBS IN TROUBLE

 

To prevent their best players leaving on a Bosman transfer - and thus costing them potential millions in lost transfer fees - clubs began signing their star names to long-term deals.

 

When the times were good and the money flowing in, this wasn't a problem.

 

But when times got tough - when clubs were relegated, or when television deals like the ITV Digital one collapsed - these long-term contracts became millstones around the clubs' necks.

 

Leeds, Sheffield Wednesday, Bradford City and Derby were all left paying non-performing players huge weekly salaries.

 

Leeds were just one of many clubs forced to sell their brightest talents - like Jonathan Woodgate, Olivier Dacourt, Paul Robinson and Mark Viduka - at cut-price rates, just to get their salaries off the pay roll.

 

The smaller clubs like Bradford, who could only attract big names with big salaries, were hit hardest.

 

But even giants like Chelsea found themselves haemorrhaging cash - like the £40,000 a week they paid Bosman signing Winston Bogarde for his 12 appearances in four years.

 

 

THE RICH RULE OK

 

The smaller clubs could no longer rely upon transfer fees to boost their coffers.

 

Whereas before they could develop home-grown talent and know that they could sell it on to the big boys, their best young players could leave for free at the end of their deals.

 

The rich clubs, at the same time, were the only ones who could afford to match the biggest stars' newly-inflated salaries.

 

And the pool of money available to the big clubs was increasingly diverted to the pockets of out-of-contract foreign players and their agents rather than going on transfer fees to lower league teams

 

As UEFA chief executive Lars-Christer Olsson explains: "Those clubs who had access to all the money started to rob the smaller clubs, not just to get stronger themselves but to weaken the opposition."

 

 

BOSMAN HIMSELF

 

Ironically, Bosman himself was left bereft by his far-reaching court action.

 

He started his case in 1990 when he was 25 and in the prime of his career, was left in limbo for five years and then, one year after he won, he had to leave third division Vise because he said he could not make a living out of it.

 

He is now reduced to living off his court indemnities.

 

Bosman's lawyer Luc Misson says: "He gave his career to a court case to serve a cause, but he sees that the transfer fees are still there, quotas on home-grown players are making a comeback and the rich clubs are richer and the poor ones are poorer."

 

 

BIG BOSMANS

 

Sol Campbell

Spurs to Arsenal, 2001

Patrick Kluivert

Ajax to Milan, 1997

Steve McManaman

Liverpool to Real Madrid, 1999

Brian Laudrup

Rangers to Chelsea, 1998

Jean-Alain Boumsong

Auxerre to Rangers, 2004

 

Was looking to start a thread on this today and found this nicely compiled article from the Beeb which fitted like a glove. So simply, ten years on I was wondering what everyones take on it is on the here and now and how they feel its affected the world of football in the ten years since its conception.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Wow, that's been 10 years already? I remember giving a talk at school about it. My dad asked me what I wanted to do my talk on, I said "football", so he wrote out a big script for me about how the Bosman ruling will change football forever.

 

It would be unimaginable to go back to the old system. Try playing the first CM2 game with the Italian or Spanish leagues on. The fact that you can only have 3 foreigners in your team made it impossible to use your clubs massive finances for anything other than some Italian youngers.

 

It lead to more power to the players, and now you see a lot more situations where clubs are willing to sell someone 12 months before their contract is up, or else they face losing him for nothing. You could argue if the effects on rising players wages came from this ruling, and just how ethical it is that a player who owes a club so much can walk out on them, but it's responsible for the way that we percieve football today, so there's no one who could deny the impact the ruling has had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bosmon transfers are dangerous. If a club has a great player and looses him to a bosman, it can have denied them 10million...

 

Oh, Sol Campbell for example, that was bad for Spurs. It's not all bad though, Jay Jay Okocha and Davids have been stars, and didn't cost a penny. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see the Bosman rule as being anything other than right, how someone can sign a contract with an employer for 4 years and at the end of that contract their employer say's what they do, it's just wrong. However right it is legally it has had the wrong effect on football. Situations like the one with Rio Ferdinand in the summer, holding out for around £20,000 per week more when he had 2 years left on his contract shows how stupid it's become, but the top clubs have to keep tying their best players down for as long as possible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...