The Fury Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Believe it or not (and this may take some people off guard), there has been talk about replacing Scott D'Amore as head booker. His replacement? Jeff Jarrett. This is not confirmed and has only been talked about. Dave Meltzer also made note of this in a recent interview. if this is true then i fear and pity tna wrestling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 I really hope not, the TNA booking team since its interception in the summer has done a grand job with TNA, maybe producing some of the best TNA TV in its history, I really feel by putting Jarrett is a head bookers posistion will make his power play in TNA even worse. Do you have a source for this report? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proudy Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 bye bye TNA :lol Jarrett as head booker, will kill TNA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFill Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 If it comes true, then there are 2 options: 1) TNA = WCW in it's dieing years. 2) Jarrett retired from the main event. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fury Posted November 9, 2005 Author Share Posted November 9, 2005 If it comes true, then there are 2 options: 1) TNA = WCW in it's dieing years. 2) Jarrett retired from the main event. seeing jerrett hog the title over the years. i'd say option 1 doesnt tna listen to the fans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Well if there's one thing TNA needs, it's more Jarrett. I meant less. LESS. Oh crap what have I said? :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 why does everyone hate Jarrett? he's doing his job, a job that i would love to have, i dont care if Jarrett is in the main eventing in TNA for 1 year or 20 years, Jarrett rules and for TNA to have JJ as head booker is a great thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JobberJoe Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 YAS... if I could have anything in TNA more of, it would be more Jarret... kind of like if I could have anything in the world I'd have more fillings in my teeth so I can spend more time in the dentist's chair with a drill in my mouth suffering severe pain... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooneronastick Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 why does everyone hate Jarrett? he's doing his job, a job that i would love to have, i dont care if Jarrett is in the main eventing in TNA for 1 year or 20 years, Jarrett rules and for TNA to have JJ as head booker is a great thing. Jarrett is an ego maniac that couldn't get above mid-card in WWE, so he uses Daddy's influence with the NWA to keep him as champion. Jeff Jarrett has never had main event credentials and really should be used to put the newer guys over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drake Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Jarrett is an ego maniac that couldn't get above mid-card in WWE' date=' so he uses [i']Daddy's[/i] influence with the NWA to keep him as champion. Jeff Jarrett has never had main event credentials and really should be used to put the newer guys over. Right on the money man,that about sums up Jarret wrestling carrer :xyx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 kind of like if I could have anything in the world I'd have more fillings in my teeth so I can spend more time in the dentist's chair with a drill in my mouth suffering severe pain... oh im sorry are we surpose to be impressed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JobberJoe Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 oh im sorry are we surpose to be impressed? .... yes... can't top you though can I, the absolute comic genius of TWO... how can I dare, DARE try to be humerous (or put my point of view across) when you, YOU MR "PERFECT", are there to point out I'm not on the same brilliant level as you... well thanks lad, but when I want your opinion I'll ask for it, until then take it and stick it up your hilarious... as I was saying... more Jarret, baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad ! ! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFill Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Now now people. Let's keep this civil, shall we. I know where this is heading, and none of us what that. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestiger99 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Jarrett=death of TNA. The guys is terrible, Bad in ring, bad on the mic, nowhere above mid card. Him as a booker would be terrible. I really doubt they would replace D'Amore with him, as he's been doing a great job. Hopefully this will all blow over soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaedon Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 like a turd circling in the drain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave7g Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 like a turd circling in the drain Thats way too harsh, what about HHH and Stephanie booking Raw? What the hell is so different? If you don't like TNA thats FINE, but stop putting it down at every opportunity when you are completely shot down every time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 Triple H uses what power he has, a lot better ,for the buisness, than Jarrett. Does Jarrett job to complete nobodies? No. Does Jarrett put the right peopel over, at the right time? No. Triple H put Shelton, Benoit and batista over clean, despite none being credible before their feuds. People always say Jarrett is midcard, well their whole set of main eventers are aswell. No matter who they pick for Champion, that person will be a midcarder, so "better the devil you know", eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 . Triple H put Benoit over clean' date=' despite not being credible before their feud.[/quote'] :? In what way was benoit not credible? He had been portrayed in WWE as ready for nearly a year before hand. It was a nice slow build up that worked well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 :? In what way was benoit not credible? He had been portrayed in WWE as ready for nearly a year before hand. It was a nice slow build up that worked well. You are right in what you said, but even so, I still don't think Benoit was right to win the title. I mean, did you expect him to win? I certainly didn't, and I'm sure if we can possibly go back and look at the Precition page, we'll see most people expected Triple H or Michaels to win, so in that sense, he wasn't seen as a threat to either. He always comes accross as someone who will be around the title scene sometimes, but will never get the belt, no matter how good he is in feuds, or how well he is built up, much like Eddie. both probably deserve it, but I don't ever consider them real threats really. I also think, Triple H losing to Benoit again a while after WM, wasn't needed, as he had definetly not been built up properly, so in that sense, Benoit wasn't seen as credible then either. One that springs to mind, is at the Gold Rush tournament. I think I'm right in saying he had done very little before that match, so why would he deserve to beat Triple H? Either way, Benoti is a close one, so feel free to ignore that point. I'm still right about Shelton and Batista though. Neither were seen as a threat to Triple H, until he got them over. Batista was getting small reactions, much like any heel, before Triple H made him, and now look. He is a huge star, something whcih Jarrett has done how many times in TNA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFill Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 You are right in what you said' date=' but even so, I still don't think Benoit was right to win the title. I mean, did you expect him to win? I certainly didn't, and I'm sure if we can possibly go back and look at the Precition page, we'll see most people expected Triple H or Michaels to win, so in that sense, he wasn't seen as a threat to either.[/quote'] Who leaves with the belt: HHH: 27 people. Benoit: 24 people. HBK: 17 people. Winner: HHH: 25 people. Benoit: 25 people. HBK: 17 people. HBK & Benoit: 2 people. So, he was seen as more of a threat than HBK, so had already been Champ by taking it off of HHH, although HHH and HBK are bestest buddies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 Who leaves with the belt: HHH: 27 people. Benoit: 24 people. HBK: 17 people. Winner: HHH: 25 people. Benoit: 25 people. HBK: 17 people. HBK & Benoit: 2 people. So, he was seen as more of a threat than HBK, so had already been Champ by taking it off of HHH, although HHH and HBK are bestest buddies. Ah OK then, fair enough. I apologise :) Still right about the other two though :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFill Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 The problem with HHH putting Shelton over is that although DAVE~! went on to bigger and better things, since Carlito beat Shelty, he's been doing nothing. So, HHH's "rub" didn't really help him much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HulkFearsAustin Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 The problem with HHH putting Shelton over is that although DAVE~! went on to bigger and better things, since Carlito beat Shelty, he's been doing nothing. So, HHH's "rub" didn't really help him much. So Shelton being in the mid-card now is HHH's fault, right? :roll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave7g Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 So Shelton being in the mid-card now is HHH's fault' date=' right? :roll[/quote'] Well, all I know is that it's not Jeff Jarrett's fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFill Posted November 10, 2005 Share Posted November 10, 2005 You obviously didn't read what I wrote. What I'm saying is that no matter what HHH did to help him in the beginning, he's now lower than mid-card. He has been on Heat for ages, and only on Raw for the last 2 weeks - that's hardly the mid-card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.