Kane or The Undertaker?

[Guest Christian Rules]

At least taker has some character left though.

[Guest deadmansacolyte]

the deadman definatly (as you may guess from my username)

[Guest shelton]

neither they both wrestle in slow motion these days

 

whatever taker is a bloody legend

 

TAKER KILLS ANYONE

[Guest Simon]

i think thats Slander... maybe Libel' date=' ask Simon[/quote']

 

If it was committed in England, libel

 

If it was committed in Scotland, defamation

 

Our legal system > theirs.

 

Undertaker is better than Kane now for obvious reasons, they've completely ruined Kane these days.

[Guest The Genetic Jackhammer]

Taker. There is a reason he is pushed as heavily as he is/was.

 

because hes an ********??

[Guest The Franchise]

because hes an ********??

 

No. Because he is what Kane is not. A L-E-G-E-N-D. :worship

[Guest Carlito C. Cool]

Its gotta to be Taker he's a legend I'm surprised he hasn't held the title more times

 

then again he doesn't need the title to be over hes mega over already