WWE Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Who, in your opinion (NOBODY else's, answer this yourself) is more entertaining and great to watch as a WWE Superstar (this can be all his career time). Kane or The Undertaker?. My answer will be up later. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Kane anyday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluestiger99 Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Taker. There is a reason he is pushed as heavily as he is/was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moobs Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Agreed, I think Taker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanenite Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Well I think it's obvious who i'm gonna pick, Kane. He is just so much more entertainment, name me one time when Kane got boring. His feud with snitsky was boring to begin with but kane never got boring he always brought to the table and pleased the fans. No matter who he has feuded with he has always been a star and entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2James Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Taker foe so many obvious reasons. I dont even think a legend one of the greatest ever Undertaker could be compared to Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyndorf Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Kane or Undertaker what? who's better? who's taller? who's smarter? who hates putting people over more? Undertaker probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2James Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Kane or Undertaker what? who's better? who's taller? who's smarter? who hates putting people over more? Undertaker Undertaker Undertaker Undertaker Undertaker Hope that helps :xyx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Rules Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Undertaker has always been good! Kane is terrible at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooneronastick Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Undertaker has always been good! Kane is terrible at the moment. Kane always sucks when he is face. Kane was made to be heel and is a good one but Undertaker is the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Rules Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Kane always sucks when he is face. Kane was made to be heel and is a good one but Undertaker is the man. Your right, Kane sucks as a face. Especially this time as when he unmasked it was the last time he could get over as a monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anime Otaku Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Taker :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malaphesto Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 underweartaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWE Posted March 4, 2005 Author Share Posted March 4, 2005 Lmao. He takes underwear? ;) :lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anime Otaku Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 i think thats Slander... maybe Libel, ask Simon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krisbaillie Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Taker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaile Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 the dead man easy, hes one of the best wrestlers of recent times, especially in the attitude area where there were many good wrestlers, today everyone just sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAW_Diva Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Taker, no question about it - he is the ony reason I shelled out as much as I did for the Manchester SD taping...so I could see his whole slot up close. (Granted it was a painfully terrible match that was put on purely because the entire crowd wanted to see the Deadman, but still...) Anyway, I just don't get the whole Kane thing - he bores me. All the time. Whether he's doing his 'Hulk smash' routine or as a face...just don't like him. The only time I found him mildly amusing was during the casket match between Taker and hide-and-seek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Franchise Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Undertaker has always been better than Kane. In all aspects. As a wrestler and a performer. Not to mention Taker has had better matches over the years than Kane. This choice indeed should be a no brainer:TAKER!!! :devil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyOrtonSec.A Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Undertaker. its close though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartynJ Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Easily The UNDERTAKER he's been threw alot more in his wwe career had better storylines from locking the WARRIOR in a casket to the attitude era when he joined forces with the BIG SHOW and made him do all them tests ,to his RESPECT gimick when he turned heel again against poor old JR etc................... i can go on all night FAV Undertaker saying "LET THE PAIN AND DESTRUCTION BEGIN" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiritchaser Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Kane is called Kane, and The Big Red Machine Taker is called The Undertaker, Taker, The Phenom, The Man From The Darkside, The Deadman, Tha American BadAss. Taker wins on names alone Spiritchaser Alive When The Death Bell Rings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Fully Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Kane for me. Taker is a legend but Kane just has something else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 The Dead Man for me. Around teh fued with Mankind,to the end of the Ministry angle I loved everything he did (except WM15, which was only ok). The man is rightly branded a legend, when the term is bandied around to loosely these days IMO> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortigern Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 neither they both wrestle in slow motion these days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts