Jump to content

Jung

Deadicated Fans
  • Posts

    17,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Jung last won the day on July 29 2010

Jung had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Jung

  • Birthday 01/13/1984

Converted

  • Occupation
    flunky

Jung's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

230

Reputation

  1. Is that petty attempted one-upsmanship childish replying or were you avid NJPW watcher in 1992? Cause honestly the first Austin match you think of, is that? B*llocks.
  2. Its ironic really, I thought Hardy would fail merely because I couldn't imagine he'd be a good heel, yet he's actually been pretty good. But it's all in vain and completely irrelevant because he's just a guy people want to cheer for. It's much the same as Austin in 2001, he was actually a very good heel yet it really didn't matter. People love him. RVD would have made a much better choice for a heel what with all his recent comments, the fact he only cares for himself and his whole original Mr Monday Night persona working so well. Begs the question why didn't they do that? Because it's too obvious?
  3. Sounds like a lot of terrible over the top crowded booking, as per usual and nothing particularly outstanding in the match front. And the idea of 2 major retirements (supposedly) within like an hour, just totally undermines both of them.
  4. The McLaren simply hasn't been first enough for a good half of the season. It's a testament to Hamilton that he's even in with a shout at the last race. For me, Alonso is clearly in the strongest position and my pick for the title and I think Red Bull will regret having Vettel win ahead of Webber today.
  5. Bret Hart's for me is probably beating Perfect at SS91 or beating Flair in 92. Bulldog's was certainly his match against Bret at SS92. Batista for me was against HHH at WM. Rey was against Eddie at Haov 97, Goldberg against Hogan in 98. Hall against HBK at WM10, which I also think was HBK's defining match.
  6. I'd imagine that if he doesn't get a run of games when he is fit again, then that's it for him. Which is a massive shame for him and England.
  7. You have to feel for him, talk about bad luck. But I suppose considering the amount of time he's been out for, the other muscles and body parts probably were going to feel the strain. Had it been the knees, I think it would have been curtains for his career. Hopefully it's just a strain and a minor setback and he'll get a proper start for Utd. When fully fit he's their best defensive midfielder by a massive distance.
  8. Unbelieveable effort by Hulkenberg and he could be a real spanner in the works. The first corner will be super interesting as the top guys will have to be relatively aggressive but obviously know that any mistakes or to be too trying could mean no points and title race over. Webber will obviously be looking to beat Vettel into the first corner and I'd imagine Alonso same with Hamilton. But yeah fascinating qualifying and massive kudos to Hulkenberg who was just in a different league to everybody and surely cemented his seat for next season.
  9. But even with restricted to WWE style, nobody can get over anyway by just wrestling. As I said they should be looking at Daniel Bryan and thinking, hhmm this is working and we're doing sod all and he's getting over.
  10. I think that's the frustrating thing though Mitch, they have guys like Danielson, Ziggler, Punk, Kaval, Hart Dynasty, Bourne, Edge, Mysterio, Del Rio, Morrison, Kingston, Christian etc etc who can all have and should be given 10-15 minutes every show to just go out there and do what they like. And the guys they've signed up like Creed, the ROH bloke whose name escapes me and others will fit into that ilk. It's like they say they have really weak talent pool, yet the talent they do have do the opposite of what they are good at it. Its why ECW and Heyman worked so well, if someone's good at certain things make them do that. I mean Daniel Bryan has one decent match in WWE and all of a sudden he's getting a bit of time every week, because his work alone, will get him over whether WWE push him or not. So even with a PG, kiddies product, all those guys I mentioned can have really good matches and get people interested simply based on that. So yeah just use Raw for those guys to get over and then shockingly enough people will pay to see these guys match up against each other in feuds on PPV. So simple.
  11. And as everyone continually points out, whether it's a kids show or an attitude adults show, if the booking is crap, the show's still sh*t. There's a reason WWE generally has been poor for a few years now and it's got absolutely nothing to do with being PG.
  12. It was never really pushed as PG in the early 90's either though. I mean the only difference in the early 90's (and I mean basically 93-94) was they pushed it as the new generation and supposedly matches were a lot more faster and what not with the likes of Bret and HBK being the new up and coming stars. In terms of PG though, there was no discernible difference in terms of content.
  13. Oh absolutely no question at all. Sure there was the odd trickle of blood or risque (for the time) angle but yeah absolutely PG.
  14. I'm not sure about that, I had a number of 80's and 90's WWE videos and pretty much all of them were PG's. Heck go to the BBFC website and have a look. Most WWF 80's and pre-attitude videos from the 90's (well PPV ones) were a PG.
×
×
  • Create New...